Editorial standards
Every clinical page is gated on a named reviewer with a recorded credential and date. Pages that have not cleared review are visible but excluded from search engines.
Why this page exists
This site publishes information about medical services while being paid by a provider of those services. That is a structural conflict, and the only useful response is to be specific about how content is made and what stops us from writing whatever converts best.
The gates a page has to clear
These are enforced by the publishing system, not by anyone remembering. A page that fails any of them cannot be marked indexable, and the production build fails if someone tries.
- Medical review
- Any page discussing IV therapy, NAD+, weight management, illness, injury, eligibility, benefits, risks, or clinical comparisons requires a named reviewer with a recorded credential and review date. A page with a blank reviewer is served noindex, and the build refuses a build where one is marked approved anyway.
- Sources
- A medical page must carry at least one dated source. A cost page must carry a source for every published price range. We would rather publish no number than an invented one.
- Local evidence
- A page about a specific neighbourhood or city requires at least three dated, specific local facts. This is what stops location pages from becoming the same article with the place name swapped.
- Spanish review
- A Spanish page requires an independent Spanish-language reviewer before it can be indexed. Writing the Spanish and reviewing it are separate jobs, and the person who wrote it cannot sign off on it.
- Similarity
- An automated pass compares every page against its cluster siblings. If two approved pages are too similar, the build fails until one is rewritten or merged.
How we choose sources
In descending order of preference.
- Primary regulatory and licensing sources: Texas state boards, the Texas Department of State Health Services, and published state rules.
- Systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines from professional bodies.
- Peer-reviewed primary research, with its limitations stated rather than glossed.
- Government consumer-health publications.
- We do not cite provider marketing material, wellness blogs, or supplement retailers as evidence for a health claim, ever.
What we will not publish
- That any service cures, prevents, or treats a specific condition, where the evidence does not support it.
- That a service is guaranteed to be available, same-day or otherwise.
- That any provider is the 'best', 'top-rated', or '#1' without a documented, published methodology.
- Ratings, review counts, or testimonials we cannot verify the origin of.
- That a provider is board-certified or licensed unless we have seen the document.
- That this platform is HIPAA compliant. That claim requires an independently verified system and operating process, and we have not undergone one.
Corrections
If we get something wrong, tell us and we will fix it. Substantive corrections are noted on the page with the date, rather than being edited silently — a page that changes its facts without saying so is not trustworthy even when the new facts are right.
Every page carries a correction link at the bottom. You do not need an account, and you do not need to be a customer.
How often pages are refreshed
Cost pages are reviewed at least every six months, because prices move and a stale range is worse than none. Clinical pages are reviewed at least annually or whenever a cited guideline is updated. Location pages are reviewed annually, because coverage areas change.
Every page shows its last review date. If a date looks old, treat the page with the scepticism that deserves.
Common questions
Who writes this content?
The platform's editorial team. Individual bylines will be added before the service-authority content set publishes; today pages carry an organizational byline because that is who actually wrote them.
Can a provider change what you write?
No. A participating provider can correct factual information about their own business, and that is the extent of it. They cannot commission, edit, or veto editorial content.
Written by: San Antonio Mobile Health Editorial TeamWritten and maintained by the San Antonio Mobile Health editorial team. We are not clinicians. Pages covering clinical topics are held out of search results until a named, credentialed reviewer has approved them.
Last reviewed: August 4, 2026
Last fact-checked: August 4, 2026
Related pages
- About San Antonio Mobile Health
An independent local resource that helps San Antonio residents explore mobile healthcare and connect with participating independent providers. We are not a clinic.
- Provider Participation Standards
The requirements a provider agrees to, stated plainly — including the parts we cannot verify and what happens when a complaint is filed.
- How Sponsored Placement Works
Some participating providers pay to take part in this platform, which may include featured placement. Payment may influence where a provider appears. It does not permit a provider to alter our general educational standards or make unsupported claims.